April 06,2004

Grassley Floor Statement, Urges "Yes" on Cloture on JOBS Act

Mr. President, we all know that we are likely to pass only a few major tax bills this election year, and we know that one important tax bill is the JOBS bill that comes up for a cloture vote tomorrow. We know that the only way the JOBS bill can pass is by a yes vote for cloture tomorrow. But once again we must ask, will the Democrats say no to cloture?

Will they go on record opposing the provisions that are in this bill?

Keep in mind, Mr. President, that the JOBS bill could be the last train out of town this year. It has to get done to end sanctions against U.S. exports.

Each time a member votes against cloture, it lessens the chance of moving this bill forward, and kills off the many good measures in the JOBS bill.

The JOBS bill was, from the very beginning, constructed on a bipartisan basis. A no vote on cloture is an obstruction to the bipartisanship that is in this bill.

Let’s talk about the measures that are in the JOBS bill. Many members asked for their inclusion.

Let’s go over what is in this bill and then ask why the Democrat leadership is telling its members to kill the bill by voting no on cloture.

This bill will end $4 billion a year of sanctions against U.S. exports. As of March 1st, those sanctions are being imposed against U.S. exports of grain, timber, paper, and manufactured goods.

You will hear my comments on the products that are being hit right now by sanctions.

We can end the sanctions with this bill, but will the Democrats say no on cloture? Will theycontinue to allow the sanctions to stay in place?

This bill provides $75 billion of tax relief to our U.S.-based manufacturing sector to promote factoryhiring in the United States. But will the Democrats say no?

The JOBS bill extends the R& D tax credit through the end of 2005. This is a domestic tax benefitthat generates research and development in the United States. That translates to good, high-payingjobs for workers here in America -- not overseas.

But will the Democrats again say no?

The JOBS bill extends for two years many tax provisions that expired in 2003 and 2004.

This includes items such as the work opportunity tax credit and the welfare-to-work tax credits, and make the merger of those credits permanent. Sen. Bayh and Sen. Santorum asked for these provisions, and we put them in.

Sen. Breaux and Sen. Snowe asked for a provision that allows naval shipbuilders to use a method of accounting which results in more favorable income tax treatment. We included that in this bill.

There are enhanced depreciation provisions to help the ailing airline industry. Sen. Lincoln, Sen.Brownback, and Sen. Roberts asked for these provisions.

There are New Homestead provisions requested by Sen. Dorgan, Sen. Baucus, Sen. Thomas, Sen.Enzi, and Sen. Crapo.

These are rural development provisions to create businesses in counties that are losing population.For example, they provide incentives for starting or expanding a rural business in a rural high outmigrationcounty.

At the request of Sen. Dorgan, we also included a New Markets Tax Credit for High Out-MigrationCounties. These credits help economic development in rural counties that have lost over 10 percentof their population.

There is only one way the Homestead and New Market provisions can become law this year, and thatis to vote yes on cloture.

The JOBS bill includes Brownfields Revitalization that was requested by Sen. Lautenberg, Sen.Dole, and Sen. Inhofe. The bill helps tax-exempt investors that invest in the clean-up andremediation of qualified brownfield sites.

Sen. Bob Graham, Sen. Breaux, and Sen. Hatch asked us to include the Mortgage Revenue Bondsmeasure. It would repeal the current rule that doesn’t allow mortgage revenue bond payments to beused for issuing new mortgages. There are 70 Senate co-sponsors on this bill.

We allow deductions for private mortgage insurance. This was asked for by Sen. Lincoln and Sen.Smith. It benefits people struggling to afford a home. I hope no one votes against this idea. A voteagainst cloture will be a vote against this deduction.

The bill includes a tax credit to employers for wages paid to reservists who have been called to activeduty. Sen. Landrieu and Sen. Allen asked for this provision.

At the request of Sen. Schumer and Sen. Clinton, we have extended and enhanced the Liberty ZoneBonds provided for the rebuilding of lower Manhattan.

We also include $200 million in new tax credits to be used on rail infrastructure projects in the NewYork Liberty Zone.

We even included Renewal Communities provisions that were requested by Sen. Clinton andSchumer.

Will the Senate Democrat leadership ask their members to vote against Liberty Zone funding andcommunity renewal by voting no on cloture?

We should not deny funding for the Liberty Zone just to prove a political point on a proposed laborregulation that may never be finalized. Even if it is finalized, Congress can always overturn it underthe Congressional Review Act.

Hundreds of regulations are proposed in Washington every week. Very few make it to the finishline. So why is the Democrat leadership holding up funding for the Liberty Zone over a proposedregulation?

This is not responsible governance. It is political grandstanding and obstruction for election yearpolitics.

The Liberty Zone needs our help, and we need behave like adults and get this bill done.

In the JOBS Act, we increase small business industrial development bond levels to spur economicdevelopment in rural areas. This was requested by Sen. Pryor and Sen. Thomas.

We have bonds for rebuilding school infrastructure, so-called QZABs. QZABs were requested bySen. Conrad.

We have included Tribal Bonds in the JOBS bill, which were requested by Sen. Campbell and Sen.Johnson. I am sure this is supported by Sen. Daschle as well.

These bonds allow the same rules that apply to tax-exempt bonds for states and local governmentsto also apply to Native American tribes issuing tax-exempt bonds to finance facilities on areservation.

We have included Tribal School Bonds, again at the request of Sen. Johnson and Sen. Campbell.Under current law, there is no class of bonds designated for the purpose of encouraging schoolconstruction on Indian reservations. These bonds fill that void.

We have a new Tribal New Markets Tax Credit, which was added at the request of Sen. Daschle andSen. Campbell. This amendment would add $50 million a year in economic development onreservation land.

But will the Democrat leadership tell Democrats to vote against cloture and kill these NativeAmerican measures?

We have included the Civil Rights Tax Fairness Act. Sen. Bingaman, Sen. Collins, and I all wantedthis provision included.

Sen. Conrad, Sen. Santorum, and Sen. Bunning asked that we add a change to section 815. Theprovision suspends application of the rules imposing income tax on certain distributions toshareholders from the policyholder’s surplus account of a life insurance company. This is in the bill.

We have a special dividend allocation rule that benefits farm co-ops. Sen. Lincoln and Sen.Coleman asked for it, and we included it in the bill.

We have other farm provisions that give cattlemen tax-free treatment if they replace livestock withbecause of drought, flood, or other weather-related conditions. Sen. Daschle and Sen. Thomas askedfor this provision.

At the request of Sen. Cantwell and Sen. Thomas, we included a provision that allows paymentsunder the National Health Service Corps loan repayment program to be exempt from tax. This isan important measure to enhance the delivery of medical services to rural areas.

We included Passenger Rail Infrastructure Tax Credits, at the request of Sen. Carper. It provides$500 million for intercity passenger rail capital projects.

We also include the Short-Line credits requested by Sen. Smith and Sen. Brownback.

At the request of Sen. Rockefeller and Sen. Hatch, we have added a provision to allow taxpayers toapply their bonus depreciation against AMT credits. This measure is important to the steel mills ofWest Virginia.A provision benefiting Oldsmobile dealers was included at the request of Sen. Baucus and Sen.Bingaman. The proposal will provide tax-free treatment to Oldsmobile dealers for termination offranchises.How many times have we heard members talk about the need to make broadband available to ruralcommunities? We know it is essential to the economic competitiveness of rural American. Weknow many Democrat senators support this and it is in the bill.

Sen. Murray and Sen. Smith asked for the Forestry Bond provisions in this bill. That proposal allowsnonprofits to use tax-exempt bond financing to acquire forest land to achieve better balance betweenthe goals of conservationists and the timber industry. Up to $1.5 billion in bonds may be issuedunder this program. That is a lot of conservation money.

At the request of Sen. Boxer, we have included a proposal that would allow employers to take a 50%tax credit against their FICA taxes for wages paid to first responders who are called to active duty.

We added a second measure at Sen. Boxer’s request. This proposal would allow farmers andranchers to take a 30% credit for the installation of irrigation equipment which reduces water use.

The credit would be limited to land that has received drought assistance during the past three years.Anyone who votes against cloture is voting to kill all of the items I just listed.

All of the beneficial provisions I have just listed are being held hostage because the Democratleadership is pushing for a vote on an issue that is not even in this bill.

The vote is an attempt to embarrass the Administration in an election about a proposed Laborregulation on overtime.

The Democrats said the regulation was going final and they had to add it to the JOBS bill orotherwise they would block the JOBS bill.

Well, that was 2 weeks ago and the regulation is still not final, and it may never be made final.

It is all politics, all the time, from the Democrat leadership. It is nothing but obstruction.

That is inexcusable because we have worked hard throughout this process to make sure thateveryone’s concerns, both Republican and Democrat, were incorporated into this bill.

You see that effort in the amendments I just listed.

But if it wasn’t overtime, it would be something else to obstruct this bill, like minimum wage, TAAfor services, some kind of health care issue – anything in order to block the JOBS bill.It is all about the Democrat leadership keeping the EU sanctions in place in order to drive down theeconomy for the fall elections.

This is especially outrageous when you consider the bipartisan history of the JOBS bill.The JOBS bill is a completely bipartisan bill. Construction of the JOBS bill began when Sen.Baucus was Chairman of the Finance Committee.

Sen. Baucus and I have always worked with our Finance Committee colleagues on the bipartisandevelopment of this FSC-ETI repeal and international tax reform package.

Let me empha that there is not one provision in this JOBS bill that was not agreed to by bothRepublicans and Democrats.

We have acted in good faith to produce a bill that protects American manufacturing jobs and makesour companies globally competitive.

Let's get on with the business at hand and finish this bill. Vote for cloture tomorrow. Put thebipartisan JOBS bill ahead of partisan politics.

Let’s put the adults back in charge, and get the JOBS bill voted out of the Senate.