June 17,2020
Grassley Seeks Broader Watchdog Review of State Unemployment System Failings
Request follows letter from Senate Democrats seeking targeted review of only Florida system
Washington – Senate Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley
(R-Iowa) is today requesting an expanded review of problems in state
unemployment systems from the Department of Labor Office of Inspector General
(OIG), broadening a similar previous request from Democratic colleagues.
“A
recent letter to you from Senators Schumer and Wyden requested that you
investigate Florida’s delivery of unemployment benefits and temporary expanded
benefits provided in the CARES Act,” Grassley wrote. “I support a review
of how state systems have performed in this unprecedented time. However, I am
concerned that a focus solely on one state’s experience will limit the usefulness
of the investigation and could be perceived to be politically motivated.”
Citing
multiple reports
of problems
or failings
in a number of states, Grassley asks that any OIG review include a broader
sweep of states so Congress can have a more accurate picture of what needs improvement
across the country.
Full
text of Grassley’s letter to Dahl follows or can be found HERE.
June 17, 2020
Via Electronic
Transmission
The
Honorable Scott S. Dahl
Inspector
General
United
States Department of Labor
200
Constitution Ave NW
Washington,
DC 20210
Dear
Mr. Dahl,
A
recent letter to you from Senators Schumer and Wyden requested that you investigate
Florida’s delivery of unemployment benefits and temporary expanded benefits
provided in the CARES Act. I support a review of how state systems have
performed in this unprecedented time. However, I am concerned that a focus
solely on one state’s experience will limit the usefulness of the investigation
and could be perceived to be politically motivated. Many states have faced
similar problems, so I request that you expand any investigation to include
other states that faced systems and benefit delivery challenges so Congress can
have the information needed to inform future policymaking efforts. This would
obviously require that the results from your investigation of states be
released at the same time, rather than in a piecemeal fashion.
As
the public health crisis began impacting the economy, every state faced
unprecedented challenges in handling an unprecedented surge of claims filed for
unemployment insurance benefits. News articles in almost every state have
highlighted the strain placed on state unemployment systems. The letter that
you received from Senators Schumer and Wyden highlights that only 28 percent of
claims in Florida had been processed as of the date of the letter. Yet I am
concerned that this request is to only review problems in one system, when
others have clearly failed the unemployed as well. For example, recent news
articles have highlighted how Puerto Rico’s online application has been
riddled with problems, with only 3 percent of applications filed having being
processed three weeks after its launch. Media reports have noted
that unemployment system reforms begun in Oregon in 2009 won’t be completed
until 2025—16 years after they started, despite federal funding intended for
technology modernization reportedly having been received in 2009. Reporters in
New Jersey discovered
the state was relying on 40-year-old mainframe computers running software
developed in the 1950s. Challenges in some states have been serious enough that
agency leaders have either resigned or been replaced, including in states like
Hawaii, Kentucky, Nevada, North Carolina, Oklahoma, and Oregon.
I
agree with Senators Schumer and Wyden that we should ensure that states are
prepared and able to meet the needs of their citizens during this crisis, as
well as in more ordinary times. However, I believe an investigation focused
solely on Florida will miss key information from other states, as this appears
to be a systemic issue that needs to be addressed more broadly than looking
into one state. Gathering information from more than one state will help
provide a better picture of systematic issues that should be addressed by
Congress, and I believe such a review of state systems more broadly will
provide the information we need to make improvements to systems across the
country.
Thank
you for your continued work to oversee the implementation of the unemployment
provisions in the CARES Act, and I hope you will take my views into account as
you review state performance during this difficult time.
Sincerely,
-30-
Next Article Previous Article