April 09,2019
Grassley At Prescription Drug Pricing Hearing With PBMs
Prepared Statement
by U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa
Chairman, U.S.
Senate Finance Committee
“Drug Pricing in
America: A Prescription for Change, Part III”
Tuesday, April 9,
2019
Today,
the Committee continues its look at why prescription drug costs are so high and
what can be done to bring them down.
I’d
like to welcome our witnesses, who are top executives from major pharmacy
benefit managers, or PBMs.
Medicare
prescription drug plans hire PBMs to manage Part D benefits. In Medicaid, state
and managed care organizations also employ PBMs.
We
know that drug companies set the list price and our February hearing with CEOs
of major manufacturers focused on those high prices.
We
now turn our attention to PBMs.
PBMs
negotiate with the drug companies, as well as pharmacies, to arrive at a price
for a drug and its ultimate cost.
This
system of private entities negotiating is what I envisioned as an author of the
Part D program.
I
still believe this is absolutely the right approach. I oppose any effort to
undo the “non-interference clause” currently in statute.
However,
it’s our duty to understand how the system is working today and what we can do
to improve it.
In
addition to negotiating prices, PBMs also determine what drugs are covered and
what patients pay out-of-pocket.
Despite
this vast influence over what often amounts to life and death, many consumers
have very little insight into the workings of PBMs.
PBMs
report rebates and other price concessions to the Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services (CMS).
But,
the statute severely restricts what can be done with that information.
More
transparency is needed.
The
current system is so opaque that it’s easy to see why there are many questions
about PBMs’ motives and practices.
One
question we must ask is whether PBMs prefer a high-cost drug with big rebates
over a cheaper drug.
Some
even argue that PBMs force drug companies to raise their list price.
Senator
Wyden and I are investigating pricing and rebating practices related to
insulin. This will help us more broadly determine whether PBMs and
manufacturers today are focused on patients or their own bottom
line.
Mergers
and vertical integration is another area that has increasingly prompted
concern. All of the PBMs here today are owned by or affiliated with a insurance
plan. In many cases, the combined company also owns pharmacies and other
players in the health industry.
It’s
important we look to see whether such integration actually helps patients and
consumers, or whether it just opens the door for anti-competitive behavior.
Last
year I sent the Federal Trade Commission a letter on this very issue and asked
them to keep me apprised of their work.
I
am putting my letter and the response into the record.
I
realize I’ve raised many issues. I look forward to hearing the witnesses
providing insight and helping us find solutions.
Ranking
Member Wyden and I are committed to working on a bipartisan basis to bring drug
costs down. Our next step is to work with Committee members to develop policies
to help Medicare and Medicaid patients and protect the taxpayers.
Next Article Previous Article