February 03,2020
Grassley and Wyden Tout Benefits for Insulin Users in Prescription Drug Bill
Finance Committee Leaders
Highlight How Legislation Takes on Cost of Life-Saving Diabetes Drugs
Chairman and Ranking
Member Update Public on Investigation to Spotlight Broken System that Drives
High Insulin Prices at the Expense of Patients
WASHINGTON – Senate Finance
Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Ranking Member Ron Wyden
(D-Ore.) described how the committee’s prescription drug pricing reform bill,
passed by the committee with an overwhelming bipartisan vote in July and updated
in December, will help control the cost of insulin and help Americans with
diabetes. Grassley and Wyden also provided a brief update on the status of
their investigation into how these drugs are priced.
“Our
drug pricing bill is going to lower what seniors and American families pay for
prescription drugs, and finally bring accountability to an industry with a long
record of price gouging. Americans are crying out for action to lower
prescription drug prices, and insulin is Exhibit A for why Congress must take
action,” Grassley and Wyden said.
The
updated Prescription Drug Pricing Reduction Act (PDPRA), also known as
Grassley-Wyden, will help stem the tide of insulin’s historic price increases
and protect Americans who need it from high costs in the following ways:
Spares
Americans from Catastrophic Costs: One in five beneficiaries who are enrolled in
Medicare Part D and need insulin reach the catastrophic phase annually, which
means they are on the hook for the cost of their insulin and other drugs that
can amount to thousands of dollars under current law. Grassley-Wyden removes
that financial burden and fear by adding an out-of-pocket cap to the Part D
program. The updated version of the bill also creates an option for Part D
beneficiaries to spread their drug costs over the entire year, so they will not
only be protected from catastrophic costs, but also have more peace of mind on
their monthly costs.
Lowers
Cost-Sharing: Month
after month, patients with diabetes depend on their insulin prescription, and
with each fill comes paying their share of the cost.
· The updated version of
Grassley-Wyden lowers cost-sharing in the initial phase of the benefit, which
starts after a patient has paid any deductible and extends until they enter the
catastrophic phase, from 25 percent to 20 percent. A patient who reaches the
catastrophic phase would save, on average, over $100 before reaching the
threshold. This provides meaningful relief, especially for the numerous
patients living on an economic tightrope.
· Lowers insulin
cost-sharing by eliminating the coverage gap, or donut hole. In addition to the
patient paying 5 percent less in the initial phase—down from the 25 percent
current law patient responsibility in the donut hole, getting rid of the donut
hole enables patients to continue to a lower-cost copayment. Currently, a
patient using a common insulin covered in a typical Part D plan with a monthly
copayment may face a shift to a higher coinsurance payment when reaching the
donut hole. Under this common scenario, a $45 initial phase copayment could
turn into a $125 donut hole coinsurance payment (25 percent of a $500 a month
insulin). While the amount the patient pays will vary by plan and the
medications taken in addition to insulin, eliminating the donut hole may reduce
diabetics’ annual cost-sharing by hundreds of dollars.
Creates
a Medicare Part D inflation rebate: Grassley-Wyden puts downward pressure on the
prices insulin makers charge by creating an inflation rebate for Medicare Part
D. This means if a company raises the price of insulin faster than the rate of
inflation, roughly 2 percent, the company has to pay the difference to
Medicare. To put this in perspective, the price of leading insulin brands has
increased an average of 300 percent over the last 10 years, or 30 percent a
year. The Grassley-Wyden inflation rebate puts a stop to mindless price gouging
and holds companies accountable when they do increase prices. The downward
pressure on prices also discourages the rebate game that plays by the rule of
the higher the price, the greater the rebate.
Makes
the system fair for pharmacies and lowers prices at the pharmacy counter. Requires Part D plans and
their pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) to include concessions and fees they
negotiate with a pharmacy in the price beneficiaries pay at the pharmacy
counter, reducing out-of-pocket expenses and prohibiting retrospective
recoupment of payments to pharmacies to provide more financial predictability.
This will result in savings to patients for insulin prescriptions as
cost-sharing is based on the lower price negotiated between PBMs and
pharmacies.
Helps
physicians to identify low-cost prescription option. Expands a requirement
that Part D plans make the costs patients pay for a medication available in the
prescribing physician’s electronic medical record. The capability provided
through these real-time benefit tools puts cost information at the prescriber’s
fingertips when discussing the available drug treatment options. This helps
diabetics and others to get the best treatment at the lowest cost.
Strengthens
the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program: Grassley-Wyden gives insulin makers a choice:
lower the price of insulin, pay a steep penalty if prices stay at current
levels, or pay an even higher penalty if prices increase beyond current rates.
This improved inflation rebate in Medicaid ties what insulin makers owe to
taxpayers to what they originally charged when the drug came to market.
Grassley
and Wyden also provided an update on the status of their investigation
examining the role of manufacturers and PBMs in the rapid rise of insulin
prices.
“We
launched an investigation into insulin prices to give the American people
answers about why this critical medicine has become so expensive. We are still
on track to explain our findings about this failed market, but some companies
in the insulin pricing and supply chain have decided it’s in their interest to
stonewall the committee while Americans continue to ration their medicine,
sometimes with fatal consequences. This stonewalling is unacceptable and will
not continue,” Grassley and Wyden said.
In
February of last year, Grassley and Wyden began
a landmark investigation into why and how the price of insulin has
increased so dramatically in recent years. Grassley and Wyden requested
information on the process used to determine list prices and the process used
to determine net prices that result from negotiations and agreements with PBMs.
Next Article Previous Article